[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NAME_MAX on MingW
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: NAME_MAX on MingW |
|
Date: |
Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:56:37 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-203-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Having looked into this, it seems that the same issues apply to PATH_MAX,
> yet gnulib has a pathmax module to define PATH_MAX. What's different in
> that case?
Most systems have a PATH_MAX, only the Hurd doesn't.
Whereas only few systems have a NAME_MAX (musl libc, Cygwin, Haiku).
Therefore more existing code uses PATH_MAX.
Bruno