[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:42:35 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 |
On 4/11/21 10:19 PM, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
which of the reports do you consider as
false positives and which as real issues ? If there are some real
issues, are you willing to fix them ?
Every report is a false positive. I assume you're talking about the
reports here:
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2021-04/msg00096.html
The utimens.c false positives are apparently due to a confusing but
technically-valid use of pointers, which I fixed in Gnulib here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=a3a946f670718d0dee5a7425ad5ac0a29fb46ea1
No other fixes should be needed.
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, (continued)
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Bruno Haible, 2021/04/10
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Paul Eggert, 2021/04/11
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Kamil Dudka, 2021/04/15
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Paul Eggert, 2021/04/15
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Kamil Dudka, 2021/04/16
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Paul Eggert, 2021/04/16
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Bruno Haible, 2021/04/16
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Bruno Haible, 2021/04/16
- Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Kamil Dudka, 2021/04/17
Re: tar + cpio - covscan issues, Ondrej Dubaj, 2021/04/12