[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ptrdiff_t overflow checks for malloc-posix etc.
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: ptrdiff_t overflow checks for malloc-posix etc. |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Apr 2021 14:13:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-206-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Paul,
> * m4/realloc.m4 (_AC_FUNC_REALLOC_IF):
> Don’t start with a newline.
This is not very robust. We usually don't care about newlines or useless
indentation in the generated configure.ac any more. Therefore future
edits may reintroduce a newline here. It would be more robust to change
test $REPLACE_REALLOC = 1 || _AC_FUNC_REALLOC_IF([], [REPLACE_REALLOC=1])
to
if test $REPLACE_REALLOC = 0; then
_AC_FUNC_REALLOC_IF([], [REPLACE_REALLOC=1])
fi
Bruno
- Re: ptrdiff_t overflow checks for malloc-posix etc., (continued)
Re: ptrdiff_t overflow checks for malloc-posix etc.,
Bruno Haible <=