Re: gnulib-tool: Stop doing license notice replacements

[Eric Blake]

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:29:22PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> As agreed upon in the thread starting at
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-05/msg00102.html>.
> 
> 

> +++ b/doc/gnulib-intro.texi
> @@ -455,15 +455,22 @@ proofreading the patch.
>  @section Copyright
>  
>  Most modules are under the GPL@.  Some, mostly modules which can
> -reasonably be used in libraries, are under LGPL@.  The source files
> -always say "GPL", but the real license specification is in the module
> -description file.  If the module description file says "GPL", it means
> -"GPLv3+" (GPLv3 or newer, at the licensee's choice); if it says "LGPL",
> -it means "LGPLv3+" (LGPLv3 or newer, at the licensee's choice).
> +reasonably be used in libraries, are under LGPL@.  Few modules are
> +under other licenses, such as LGPLv2+, unlimited, or public domain.

Would read better as "A few modules are..."

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org