[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Undefined use of weak symbols in gnulib
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Undefined use of weak symbols in gnulib |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:38:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-210-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Florian Weimer wrote on 2021-04-28:
> However, you should really remove those weak symbol
> hacks. They won't have any effect for glibc 2.34
I'm trying to do this now. But what is the right condition?
1) I understand that it's only for glibc >= 2.34 on Linux (NPTL),
right? Not on Hurd (HTL)?
2) /usr/include/gnu/lib-names.h still defines LIBPTHREAD_SO.
How about not defining LIBPTHREAD_SO, since linking with it is supposed
to be a no-op in these newer glibc versions?
Bruno
- Re: Undefined use of weak symbols in gnulib,
Bruno Haible <=
Re: Undefined use of weak symbols in gnulib, Bruno Haible, 2021/07/17