Re: regex documentation

[Reuben Thomas]

On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 17:26, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

Only thing I spotted offhand was that \s and \S mean something entirely
different in glibc as syntax classes are not programmable.

I think the documentation as I've edited it is correct. Perhaps it should say "character classes" instead of "syntax classes", but I think the description of functionality is correct (it would be good, as my added TODO suggests, to have a list of the valid character/syntax classes.

--

https://rrt.sc3d.org