bug-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch to gnustep-base (Unicode and others)


From: Serg Stoyan
Subject: Re: patch to gnustep-base (Unicode and others)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:15:42 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.16i

Hello, Richard Frith-Macdonald.

 RFM> >  RFM> OK ... guess I was wrong about that ... it *does* seem to say 
 RFM> > strings
 RFM> >  RFM> should be converted to unicode ... but that's incorrect/misleading
 RFM> >  RFM> documentation.
 RFM> >
 RFM> >   What documentation do you reccomend me to use? Apple's FoundationKit
 RFM> >   and AppKit frameworks documentation? It says the same. What else?
 RFM> >   Maybe i misunderstand you at some point?
 RFM> 
 RFM> I don't think so ... I'm just saying that the wording in the 
 RFM> documentation on
 RFM> this point is poor ... and is misleading/wrong.  That doesn't mean to 
 RFM> imply
 RFM> that there is another better set of documentation anywhere.
 RFM> When you read the documentation in depth, and look at what the various
 RFM> implementations actually do, you can tell what they intended to say.

  Ok, it's clear to me now.
 
 RFM> >  RFM> Thanks, I've added them (I converted to ascii with \u escapes for
 RFM> >  RFM> consistency with the other files, but that should make no 
 RFM> > difference).
 RFM> >
 RFM> >   By the way, you probably forgot to upload these files to CVS.
 RFM> 
 RFM> Yes, sorry, they are definately comitted now.

  Works nice now. Thank you.

-- 
Serg Stoyan
Растения полезны - выделяют кислород, жизненно необходимый автомобилям.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]