[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #4066] NSWorkspace launchApplicaion: misbehaved
From: |
nobody |
Subject: |
[bug #4066] NSWorkspace launchApplicaion: misbehaved |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jun 2003 05:56:48 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030401 Debian/1.0.2-2 |
=================== BUG #4066: LATEST MODIFICATIONS ==================
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=4066&group_id=99
Changes by: Stefan Urbanek <urbanek@host.sk>
Date: Sun 06/22/03 at 11:56 (Europe/Bratislava)
What | Removed | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status | Declined | Open
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
I disagree and I would like to open this to discussion.
Ask a question: Why would you like to launch an application in most of the
cases?
1. Just to launch it and let it be launched ('just for fun')
or
2. Launch it and do something with it
I think that 2. is the case. Then I think if OS/X behaves same as gnustep at
this time, then the behaviour is wrong. This method should wait until I can
communicate with the application, that means, the method should wait until the
application is successfully lanched.
=================== BUG #4066: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================
Submitted by: stefanu Project: GNUstep
Submitted on: Sun 06/22/03 at 01:52
Category: Gui/AppKit Severity: 5 - Major
Bug Group: Bug Resolution: None
Assigned to: None Status: Open
Summary: NSWorkspace launchApplicaion: misbehaved
Original Submission: NSWorkspace launchApplication:'name' does not behave as
it should.
>From apple docs:
Returns YES if the application is successfully launched...
However, it seems to return immediately after running application process. I
think that application is 'successfulyl lanchued' when all app initialisation
priocess ends and app's delegate receives applicationDidFinishLaunching:
notification. Or ... application is sucessfully launched when i can connect to
it. I wouls expect this method to wait for all application initialisation and
for some distant notification about successfull launch.
Current misbehaviour requires workarounds to make it work.
Follow-up Comments
*******************
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 06/22/03 at 11:56 By: stefanu
I disagree and I would like to open this to discussion.
Ask a question: Why would you like to launch an application in most of the
cases?
1. Just to launch it and let it be launched ('just for fun')
or
2. Launch it and do something with it
I think that 2. is the case. Then I think if OS/X behaves same as gnustep at
this time, then the behaviour is wrong. This method should wait until I can
communicate with the application, that means, the method should wait until the
application is successfully lanched.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 06/22/03 at 11:07 By: CaS
I've just spent a couple of hours checking this.
The current GNUstep behavior appears to be the same as the MacOS-X and OpenStep
behavior ... ie the interpretation of the word 'launched' means that a process
was started, not that it is completely initialised/working. I have updated the
documentation to be (I hope) clearer about this than the MacOS-X documentation.
CC list is empty
No files currently attached
For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=4066&group_id=99
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/