[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #24564] build failure on solaris
From: |
Riccardo mottola |
Subject: |
[bug #24564] build failure on solaris |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:38:57 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 SeaMonkey/1.1.12 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?24564>
Summary: build failure on solaris
Project: GNUstep
Submitted by: rmottola
Submitted on: Tue 14 Oct 2008 09:38:55 PM GMT
Category: Base/Foundation
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
on solaris 2.5, gcc 2.95, I get:
GSSocketStream.m: In function `-[GSSocketStream
_setSocketAddress:port:family:]':
GSSocketStream.m:1394: warning: implicit declaration of function `inet_pton'
GSSocketStream.m: In function `-[GSSocketInputStream close]':
GSSocketStream.m:1683: `SHUT_RD' undeclared (first use in this function)
GSSocketStream.m:1683: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
GSSocketStream.m:1683: for each function it appears in.)
GSSocketStream.m: In function `-[GSSocketInputStream _dispatch]':
GSSocketStream.m:1900: warning: passing arg 4 of `getsockopt' from
incompatible pointer type
I propose the following for the SHUT_RD missing:
#ifndef SHUT_RD
#define SHUT_RD 0
#define SHUT_WR 1
#define SHUT_RDWR 2
#endif
I have seen that in old code often the numbers were used directly and the
modern manpage explicitely state that those values are hard-coded.
Or maybe a more expensive configure check should be used?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?24564>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #24564] build failure on solaris,
Riccardo mottola <=