bug-guile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#70144: system* affects signal handlers


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: bug#70144: system* affects signal handlers
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 16:17:49 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Hi,

Mikael Djurfeldt <mikael@djurfeldt.com> skribis:

> system* temporarily re-binds signal handlers to prevent the child process
> from killing the parent. Thus, it is not thread safe with regard to SIGINT
> (or SIGQUIT if available). So, your code has a race condition with respect
> to the signal handler. This common resource can, in principle, be handled
> the usual way by, for example, utilizing a mutex:

[...]

> I'm leaving this bug open. *Should* system* re-bind the signal handlers?
> Should it really protect itself from the child? If so, we should probably
> document this behaviour in the reference manual.

Unless I’m mistaken, we can remove the ‘scm_dynwind_sigaction’ calls
from ‘scm_system_star’: now that we use ‘posix_spawn’, this is all taken
care of.

This can be seen by running:

  strace -o /tmp/log.strace -f guile -c '(system* "/bin/sh" "-c" "echo foo $$")'

… which shows pre-fork signal blocking (this is
‘internal_signal_block_all’ in spawni.c in glibc) followed, in the child
(PID 28592 here), by a long series of ‘sigaction’ calls to reset
handlers to their default behavior:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
28586 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, ~[], [], 8) = 0
28586 clone3({flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_VFORK, exit_signal=SIGCHLD, 
stack=0x7f73b39b2000, stack_size=0x9000}, 88 <unfinished ...>
28592 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, ~[KILL STOP], 8) = 0
28592 rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, NULL, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 
8) = 0
28592 rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], 
sa_flags=SA_RESTORER, sa_restorer=0x7f73b432d2a0}, NULL, 8) = 0
28592 rt_sigaction(SIGINT, NULL, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[], 
sa_flags=SA_RESTORER, sa_restorer=0x7f73b432d2a0}, 8) = 0
28592 rt_sigaction(SIGQUIT, NULL, {sa_handler=SIG_IGN, sa_mask=[], 
sa_flags=SA_RESTORER, sa_restorer=0x7f73b432d2a0}, 8) = 0
28592 rt_sigaction(SIGILL, NULL, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 
8) = 0
28592 rt_sigaction(SIGILL, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], 
sa_flags=SA_RESTORER, sa_restorer=0x7f73b432d2a0}, NULL, 8) = 0
28592 rt_sigaction(SIGTRAP, NULL, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], sa_flags=0}, 
8) = 0
28592 rt_sigaction(SIGTRAP, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[], 
sa_flags=SA_RESTORER, sa_restorer=0x7f73b432d2a0}, NULL, 8) = 0
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Josselin, can you confirm?

Thanks,
Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]