[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kernel command line
|
From: |
Roland McGrath |
|
Subject: |
Re: kernel command line |
|
Date: |
Sun, 6 May 2001 16:47:26 -0400 (EDT) |
> Makes perfect sense. Looking at the output of ps to get the kernel command
> line is a natural thing to do, and much better than /proc/cmdline indeed.
> I don't see any explicit need for a fancier programmable interface either.
Well, I'm not entirely sanguine about the "PID 2 is the kernel" convention.
It is not actually a convention, it is just happenstance.
- kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/04
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/04
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/05
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/06
- Re: kernel command line,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/07
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/08
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/14
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/14
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/18
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/18