[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc broken
From: |
Mark Kettenis |
Subject: |
Re: glibc broken |
Date: |
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:05:18 +0200 |
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 18:36:52 +0200
From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:17:08PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I can't reproduce Marcus' problems with a freshly checked out glibc.
> Everything appears to work fine for me.
Can you provide us a tar of the build directory? I'd like to do a
comparison.
Hmm, the entire build directory is to large, however I have put up a
gzipped libc_pic.a and a tar of the elf/ subdirectory:
http://www.science.uva.nl/~kettenis/libc_pic.a.gz
http://www.science.uva.nl/~kettenis/elf.tar.gz
libc_pic.a.gz is about 10 MB, elf.tar.gz about 2.5 MB. Can you ping
me when you've downloaded them?
Also, can you let us know which versions of binutils and gcc you use.
binutils 2.10.1, gcc 2.95.2. These are Linux native versions that I
turned into a cross toolchain :-).
Mark
- glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/22
- Re: glibc broken, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/22
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/23
- Re: glibc broken, Mark Kettenis, 2001/05/23
- Re: glibc broken, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/23
- Re: glibc broken, Mark Kettenis, 2001/05/24
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/27
- Re: glibc broken,
Mark Kettenis <=
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/27
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/25
Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/23