[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: posix_spawn
From: |
Igor Khavkine |
Subject: |
Re: posix_spawn |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:49:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:53:52AM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> It has been noted that the slowness of fork on the Hurd may be a
> substantial factor in uses like large builds. One way to avoid this
> problem is to avoid fork. In glibc we have <spawn.h> providing posix_spawn
> and related functions; most common cases where a program uses fork and exec
> directly can be replaced by calls to posix_spawn et al.
Just out of curiosity, is posix_spawn a standard interface? And
is it reasonable for programs to expect to have it available
on a system that say, doesn't use glibc?
Igor
- posix_spawn, Roland McGrath, 2001/06/16
- Re: posix_spawn,
Igor Khavkine <=