[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs doesn't compile (again)
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: emacs doesn't compile (again) |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:47:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2i |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 06:34:23PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Is this a dumped executable (from unexec)?
> Figure out where real_morecore gets initialized.
Yes. I deleted emacs and just typed "make" to see how it is build, and
it is a dumped one, but now the behaviour is different, so I am restrating the
built.
It seems that real_morecore is initialized to __morecore in two places:
ralloc.c:r_alloc_init (and after initialization, __morecore is set to
r_alloc_sbrk).
And in ralloc.c:r_alloc_reinit, but only for DOUG_LEA_MALLOC (and if emacs is
defined), and only if __morecore is not r_alloc_sbrk.
I think this r_alloc_sbrk is just to aviod an infinite loop if emacs is
linked statically (judging the comment). So what I want to do as soon as
I have rebuild emacs from scratch to reproduce the original behaviour (doh!)
I will set a breakpoint on those init functions and see what happens.
Marcus
- emacs doesn't compile (again), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/06/19
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again), Roland McGrath, 2001/06/19
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/06/19
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again), Roland McGrath, 2001/06/19
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/06/19
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again), Roland McGrath, 2001/06/19
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again),
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/06/19
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/06/19
- Re: emacs doesn't compile (again), Roland McGrath, 2001/06/19