[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: continuing documentation
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: continuing documentation |
Date: |
29 Jun 2001 11:04:00 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
OKUJI Yoshinori <okuji@kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp> writes:
> For now, I'm afraid of two things about that. One of these is that
> people often write documents and comments differently, of course,
> intentionally. Comments tend to be terse, because too long statements
> are annoying for programmers, while documents tend to be verbose, to
> introduce concepts by making sentenses easier to understand.
I agree with Okuji here. The job of the comment in a header file is
to remind a programmer what the interface is. The job of the manual
is to explain the interface. We should in general expect that
different text will be used for those two different jobs.
- Re: continuing documentation, (continued)
- Re: continuing documentation, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/21
- Re: continuing documentation, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/06/21
- Re: continuing documentation, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/21
- Re: continuing documentation, Roland McGrath, 2001/06/21
- Re: continuing documentation, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/06/21
- Re: continuing documentation, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/22
- Re: continuing documentation, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/06/23
- Re: continuing documentation, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/23
- Re: continuing documentation, Maurizio Boriani, 2001/06/26
- Re: continuing documentation, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/28
- Re: continuing documentation,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: continuing documentation, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2001/06/29
- RE: continuing documentation, Jim Franklin, 2001/06/30
- Re: continuing documentation, Bill White, 2001/06/21
RE: continuing documentation, Chen Shapira, 2001/06/21