bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

mount build problems: was Re: First-time install problems


From: David Walter
Subject: mount build problems: was Re: First-time install problems
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:03:58 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter, hurd-i386-debian)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

Assuming this is more appropriate for bug-hurd, so I'm cc'ing that
list.

> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:31:23AM -0500, David Walter wrote:
>> I  have  this problem with the  default  mount binary. I  found if you
>> build it w/o optimization it doesn't hang, or if you are mounting :-)

More explicitly typing mount hangs as in:

     $ mount
.......wait forever......

but mount a file system doesn't.

    $ mount /mnt 

if fstab has an entry works

    $ mount /dev/hd0s11 /home 

works. (as long as you have permission)

> It's useful if you debug such bugs and sent in patches, or if you don't want
> to bother about that right at that time, just file a bug report on savannah.

On IRC someone (when I first found this problem) had dismissed this as
a 'feature' of my build, I accepted this, but continue to build w/o
optimization.

But in looking gcc3.* already had bugs posted against it for
optimization problems under some circumstances.

AFAIK this hasn't changed with gcc.  

I would have posted a bug against gcc or the Hurd or both if
appropriate and considered posting one, but for the dismissal.

Is the appropriate course to post a bug against, the Hurd for using
- -O3, gcc for the problem and the mount command itself?  Where should
these be posted, bug-hurd?

Does gcc need another bug report for this particular program failure?

- -- 
pub  1024D/DC92AE30 2002-02-26 David Walter <dwalter@syr.edu>
fingerprint = 50A0 E513 732D 1D0F BD26  C84E A8DD 9D80 DC92 AE30
sub  2048g/51023582 2002-02-26
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Hurd)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard 
<http://www.gnupg.org/>

iD8DBQE94i3MqN2dgNySrjARAg6kAKCfODMQ/R6Lf8Vv5kH4Vz/exampRQCfRdwS
Ze5YrrjZs7CsvGoMezhe2Xc=
=SK6K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]