[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Fix setsid(0)
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Fix setsid(0) |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:22:45 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Tue 17 Jan 2006 13:56:05 -0800, a écrit :
>> The same situation happens with getpgid, and you will see that in the
>> case of getpgid, the C library handles the zero-argument case itself.
>
> Well, it is a bit different: I'd interpret the way the C library does it
> as an optimization: it keeps a record of the current pgrp.
No, it's more intentional than that.
> The question might be rephrased into: do we want proc server interaction
> to be XSI-compliant, or do we want strict XSI compliancy only at libc
> level?
I think the latter, since XSI is only a specification for the C
library.
- Re: [RFC] Fix setsid(0), (continued)
Re: [RFC] Fix setsid(0), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/17
Re: [RFC] Fix setsid(0), Samuel Thibault, 2006/01/18
Re: [RFC] Fix setsid(0), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18