Re: No to StowFS!

bug-hurd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No to StowFS!

From:	Alfred M. Szmidt
Subject:	Re: No to StowFS!
Date:	Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:45:38 +0100

Fixing hard coded filenames is easy.  One can always provide a /usr
symbolic link.  Infact, any program that depends on a hard coded file
name is seriously broken.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

No to StowFS!, Leonardo Pereira, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Michael Heath, 2006/02/02
  - Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt <=
    - Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/02
    - Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
    - Re: No to StowFS!, Michael Banck, 2006/02/02
    - Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
    - Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/02
    - Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
    - Re: No to StowFS!, Michael Banck, 2006/02/03
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/02
  - Re: No to StowFS!, Leonardo Pereira, 2006/02/02

Prev by Date: Re: Checking out /gnumach exits with error
Next by Date: [bug #15073] kernel panic with sis900 NIC and gnumach(-dbg) 20050801-1
Previous by thread: Re: No to StowFS!
Next by thread: Re: No to StowFS!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread