[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:58:54 +0100 |
I do agree that such a behavior could be considered broken, but if
most of the programs do that I believe that the support for them
should be provided.
And this is easy to do, provide /usr as a symbolic link to / if such
support is needed.
Cheers.
Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/02