[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
|
From: |
Michael Banck |
|
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 02:10:15 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:58:54AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> I do agree that such a behavior could be considered broken, but if
> most of the programs do that I believe that the support for them
> should be provided.
>
> And this is easy to do, provide /usr as a symbolic link to / if such
> support is needed.
Or you could frob bash's she-bang parsing.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
mbanck@debian.org
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/02