[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
|
From: |
Filip Brcic |
|
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 02:10:41 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9 |
Дана Friday 03 February 2006 01:58, Alfred M. Szmidt је написао(ла):
> I do agree that such a behavior could be considered broken, but if
> most of the programs do that I believe that the support for them
> should be provided.
>
> And this is easy to do, provide /usr as a symbolic link to / if such
> support is needed.
Yes, of course. I just meant to say that those programs (scripts) shouldn't
necessarily be considered broken... even if they truly are.
--
Filip Brcic <brcha@users.sourceforge.net>
WWWeb: http://purl.org/NET/brcha/home/
Jabber: brcha@kdetalk.net
Jabber: brcha@elitesecurity.org
Jabber: fbrcic@gmail.com
ICQ# 40994923
Yahoo! brcha
MSN: brcha@users.sourceforge.net
pgpqJYgPiMWPb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/02