Re: Remove GNU Mach's unused device drivers

[Thomas Schwinge]

On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:15:32PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Is there some kind of logic to how you split up the ChangeLog entries?

What exactly don't you understand about it?

> How did you check that the files are ok to remove (it is a long list,
> so it is hard to check each file)?

I checked it by verifying against GNU Mach's build system.

> i386/utils/debug.h looks a
> suspicious for example.

Why?

> I'm not sure what `adopt all users' means.  Maybe you mean callees?

I mean all places where the macro is used; `NHD' was defined in
i386/bogus/hd.h to zero, now I adopted all the places where `NHD' was
used in the code to the case of it being defined to zero.  I'm open to
hear suggestions for better wording, of course, but I'm not yet convinced
that ``callees'' is more appropriate.


Regards,
 Thomas