[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation)
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation) |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:32:26 -0700 |
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 14:52 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I had emailed Thomas in regards to this because I didn't want to start
> a general panic over the license. Anyway, we have a few problems in
> any regard (I'm a Savannah Administrator, and if we have to remove the
> GPL later clause, then we're in violation of Savannah's hosting
> policy)
Once more, I seem to have taken your word for it when I shouldn't have.
The link you provided, to
https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/GnuGplTwoOrLater, certainly does
request people to use the "or any later version" clause. Well and good.
Nothing there, however, says that projects *must* use it as a condition
of being hosted on Savannah.
I do hope you are not using your position to attempt to strongarm people
into following rules that do not actually exist.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Michael Casadevall, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Michael Casadevall, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Roland McGrath, 2007/06/16
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Thomas Schwinge, 2007/06/17
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/06/17
- Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Thomas Schwinge, 2007/06/25
Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation),
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=