Re: switching to SVN ?

[Bas Wijnen]

Hello,

While I'm not currently involved with the Hurd, I do plan to change
that.  (This also means that I missed discussion on bug-hurd, since I
only read hurd-devel at the moment.)  However, I shall still only be
involved with the new Hurd, not with the Mach version.  So my opinion
should probably not count as strong.

I have experience only with cvs and svn, and I strongly prefer svn.
When I used cvs I thought it was pretty decent, but since I'm using svn
I don't want to go back.  I think using svn would be a great
improvement.  In particular, as mentioned, the atomic commit and the
ability to prepare patches without network is attractive to me.

That said, I have no opinion on using decentralised systems, since I
don't know them.  However, if they are considered the best, but it is
impractical to make the switch, going from cvs to svn would still be
well worth it IMO.

Thanks,
Bas Wijnen

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature