[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Hurd] error_t, E*, and c++
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Hurd] error_t, E*, and c++ |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2008 11:01:29 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Roland McGrath, le Mon 26 May 2008 20:01:17 -0700, a écrit :
> But I think we might just have to live with
> C++ using (error_t) EFOO,
A friend of mine suggested to rather use error_t(EFOO), which is a bit
less dirty but still works.
> or else supply a C++ <errno> or whatever where there is explicitly
> no expectation of int-valued or cpp-usable values, if people would
> actually use that.
That would be less easy to get accepted I guess.
Samuel