bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add the code for starting up the mountee


From: Thomas Schwinge
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add the code for starting up the mountee
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 01:08:10 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hello!

On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:20:19PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:33:11AM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:04:06PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > +/* Starts the mountee (given by `argz` and `argz_len`), sets it on
> > > +   node `np` and opens a port `port` to with `flags`.  `port` is not
> > > +   modified when an error occurs.  */
> > > +error_t
> > > +start_mountee (node_t * np, char * argz, size_t argz_len, int flags,
> > > +        mach_port_t * port)
> > 
> >  [...]
> > And I still don't like "np".
> 
> I looked through unionfs again and I can confirm that it uses ``np''
> for ``node pointer'' everywhere.  Should I break the convention?  I do
> agree that this isn't a very intuitive name, but I'm not sure what to
> choose: a better name or consistency.

Consistency.  `np' is used throughout all of the Hurd code, and also in
the reference manual.


Regards,
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]