Re: unionfs: stowing feature

[olafBuddenhagen]

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:

> At the time, I was actually in favor of a separate stowfs which were
> just using common code for unionfs, but politics and other rather
> meaningless reasons brought it into the way it is now.

Really? That's interesting -- I thought it was your idea to implement it
in unionfs :-)

Indeed I was always somewhat sceptical about this approach; I'd prefer
seeing it in a distinct translator...

-antrik-