[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:16:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Fri 12 Mar 2010 15:09:01 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > Maybe in the meanwhile we should alias mem and iopl in the gnumach
> > > > kernel, so already installed hurds can run Xorg (and the name
> > > > "iopl" doesn't sound so good to me to replace mem :)).
> > >
> > > Yeah, I actually mentioned on IRC that probably the best fix is
> > > renaming the kernel device...
> >
> > And break existing code that uses it?
>
> No, not necessarily. I totally agree that flag days are bad, and
> aliasing would be good for the transitional period. I meant the end
> result only here :-)
Ok :)
I've added the mem device to GNU Mach and the aliasing in the Debian
package.
Samuel
- Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Jérémie Koenig, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/12
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/18
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/18
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/19
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/19
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, 2010/03/19