[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:33:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Mon 15 Mar 2010 03:16:23 +0100, a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > I've added the mem device to GNU Mach and the aliasing in the Debian
> > package.
>
> Great :-)
>
> BTW, do you think it would be a good idea to rewrite programs opening
> the iopl/mem device directly, to use /dev/mem instead?...
If a program opens iopl/mem device directly, it is Hurd-aware. Since
/dev/mem is not the long-term plan and should be replaced by a more
hurdish mechanism, I'd just let them as they are, and only change them
once there is the hurdish mechanism.
Samuel
- Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Jérémie Koenig, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/12
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/14
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/18
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/19
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/19
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, 2010/03/19