[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:06:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:33:46PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Mon 15 Mar 2010 03:16:23 +0100, a écrit :
> > BTW, do you think it would be a good idea to rewrite programs opening
> > the iopl/mem device directly, to use /dev/mem instead?...
>
> If a program opens iopl/mem device directly, it is Hurd-aware. Since
> /dev/mem is not the long-term plan and should be replaced by a more
> hurdish mechanism, I'd just let them as they are, and only change them
> once there is the hurdish mechanism.
Yeah, good point.
-antrik-
- Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Jérémie Koenig, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/11
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/12
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/14
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/03/18
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/18
- Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem,
olafBuddenhagen <=
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Samuel Thibault, 2010/03/19
Re: Xorg, libpciaccess and /dev/mem, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, 2010/03/19