[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp] |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:04:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Diego Nieto Cid, le Wed 16 Feb 2011 14:33:15 -0300, a écrit :
> Not really. IMHO, get_hw_addr is an orthogonal feature poorly
> abstracted in isc-dhcp. To choose the implementation you have to use
> dirty hacks like the following:
>
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/htdig/dhcp-hackers/2009-March/001781.html
>
> The easiest way of getting it working under GNU/Hurd is by using
> sockets for sending and receiving packets and LPF's get_hw_addr.
>
> However, I found some trouble with hardware types identified with an
> integer bigger than 255 (ARPHRD_IEEE802_TR and ARPHRD_FDDI) and I gave
> up. Leaving them out when compiling for GNU is probably the easiest
> workaround.
Yes.
Samuel
- [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Svante Signell, 2011/02/16
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Diego Nieto Cid, 2011/02/16
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp],
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Svante Signell, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Samuel Thibault, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Svante Signell, 2011/02/21
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Samuel Thibault, 2011/02/21
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Samuel Thibault, 2011/02/21
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Svante Signell, 2011/02/22
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Samuel Thibault, 2011/02/22
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Svante Signell, 2011/02/23
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Samuel Thibault, 2011/02/23
- Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp], Svante Signell, 2011/02/23