[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:02:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Tue 06 Sep 2011 01:28:13 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:33:00AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > However, I realize that the status parameter of the device_get_status
> > RPC is out only, not inout, so device_get_status alone can not provide
> > complete support. One way would be to use a set/get pair.
>
> Well, if we need to go for a multi-RPC approach, I'd suggest doing it
> *properly*, i.e. using get_status/set_status only for actual control
> information, and pass the data with read/write calls.
It'll probably be hard to express the SCSI commands he needs that way.
Samuel
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/06
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?,
Samuel Thibault <=
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/08
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/09
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/10
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/12
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/12
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/12