[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:54:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Mon 12 Sep 2011 20:15:36 +0200, a écrit :
> > Why no "in" or "out" before parameter "device" ?
>
> Well, I would have said that the first parameter is just special. (It's
> the port on which the RPC was invoked; basically it's only there to give
> it a name.) However, I just saw that device_open() also has other
> parameters without a direction...
These other parameters are integers or constant character arrays, so
they are implictly in.
Samuel
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, (continued)
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Implicit IN? (was: Interface for SCSI transactions ?), olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/23
- Re: Implicit IN? (was: Interface for SCSI transactions ?), Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/23
- Re: Implicit IN?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/29
- Re: Implicit IN?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/14