[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ? |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:28:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:36:11PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Fri 23 Sep 2011 03:13:53 +0200, a écrit :
> > (Doing manual marshalling is extra effort; and it will have to
> > change again when moving to userspace drivers
>
> Why would it have to change again?
Because RPC-over-RPC is inherently ugly, and I'm very sure that we don't
want that in actual Hurd interfaces. I may (unwillingly) agree to have
it like that in Mach, for consistency with the preexisting ugly
device_get_status()/device_set_status() RPC-over-RPC Mach interfaces;
but I will violently protest any such uglyness being introduced in
actual Hurd interfaces.
-antrik-
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, (continued)
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/08
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/09
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/10
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/12
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/12
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/12
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?,
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/13
- Implicit IN? (was: Interface for SCSI transactions ?), olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/23
- Re: Implicit IN? (was: Interface for SCSI transactions ?), Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/23
- Re: Implicit IN?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/29