[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Provide modern Autoconf initialization
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Provide modern Autoconf initialization |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:13:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.9-101-g81dad07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) |
Hi!
In GNU Mach, we have a version.m4 where these fields are defined one and
for all. (I argue that a package's version definition does not really
belong into a generic, otherwise version-agnostic configuration system's
file.) (But on the other hand, *version*.m4 is likely not the most
suitable name for defining a package's name.) (Are we bike-shedding
yet?)
Should/could we also get rid of libhurdbugaddr? (Separate patch?) I
never quite understood its purpose.
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:41:16 +0100, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote:
> (Then again, deriving shared library names from the package release
> number doesn’t feel optimal to me (info "(libtool) Release numbers").)
Yes, that too...
Grüße,
Thomas
pgpgd4ttNRqoP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [PATCH] Provide modern Autoconf initialization, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Provide modern Autoconf initialization, Samuel Thibault, 2011/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Provide modern Autoconf initialization, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/07
- [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac, Guillem Jover, 2011/11/09
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac, Thomas Schwinge, 2011/11/10
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac, Guillem Jover, 2011/11/11
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac, Svante Signell, 2011/11/12
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/12
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/10
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac, Thomas Schwinge, 2011/11/20