[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tmpfs status
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: tmpfs status |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Apr 2012 00:35:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Maksym Planeta, le Sun 08 Apr 2012 01:28:48 +0300, a écrit :
> No, it isn't bogus and should work, but as it is hack that relies on
> implementation and how it works is not obvious (at least from my point
> of view), I decided to disable it. Do you think that it should be
> returned?
It depends how seldom it is. pager_truncate is only called when
truncating a file to a smaller size, right? That does not seem very
performance-critical, so it might be better to just remove the
optimization.
Samuel
- Re: tmpfs status, (continued)
- Re: tmpfs status, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/04/07
- Re: tmpfs status,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/04/07