Re: PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD

[Richard Braun]

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 07:42:27PM +0200, Richard Braun wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:44:54PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I can't really imagine what issue you have in mind.  To fit with the
> > convention in NPTL for extensions, it should be PTHREAD_CANCEL_POLLED_NP.
> > (The "_NP" suffix indicates it's a non-POSIX feature.)
> 
> What would you recommend we name the matching pthread_cond_wait-like
> function ? Something like pthread_cond_poll_np ?

Or rather, should we make pthread_cond_wait return ECANCELED/EINTR as
discussed ?

-- 
Richard Braun