Re: [PATCH] simplify ulimit implementation

[Pino Toscano]

Hi,

Alle lunedì 19 novembre 2012, Roland McGrath ha scritto:
> I don't think losing __UL_GETMAXBRK is really a problem.  The reason
> for removing it was not specific to Linux, just to the
> implementation being in a shared library.  It could be implemented
> in a shared library, at the cost of a GOT reloc for _etext to get
> the main executable's value (or conversely, perhaps some grovelling
> in dynamic linker data structures for the shared case).  But given
> that the current implementation usable on the Hurd will yield
> utterly useless values, the case for having it at all is
> inordinately weak.

OK.

Attached there are the two patches of the ulimit reorganization, as you 
suggested in a previous email:
1) move the linux implementation as posix (including limits.h)
2) remove the bsd implementation

Thanks,
-- 
Pino Toscano

fix-ulimit-1.diff
Description: Text Data

fix-ulimit-2.diff
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.