[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 May 2013 02:55:56 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Mon 13 May 2013 13:35:37 +0200, a écrit :
> On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 12:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > as written in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2012/09/msg00018.html
> > replied to here gdb has a PATH_MAX issue in addition to the MACH issue.
> > See the second part of the patch below. This fix was not submitted as a
> > Debian bug, due to the freeze and lack of feedback. The MACH stuff is
> > already fixed upstream I assume.
> >
> > Svante
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 16:02 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Source: gdb
> > > Version: 7.4.1-1.1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Tags: patch
> > > Usertags: hurd
> > > User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
>
> Is there any idea to submit bug reports to the Debian BTS until the
> status of Hurd in Jessie is resolved?
It can't hurt.
> If not I think the PATH_MAX patch should be sent upstream: where to
> report, bug-gdb@gnu.org?
You can send to both.
Samuel