Re: [PATCH, gnumach] ddb: fix implicit declarations

[Marin Ramesa]

On 05.07.2013 09:45:39, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Err, no, the point of putting it in a .h file is to put it into a
> single place, so you're sure everybody agree on the definition since 
> it's written only once. The .h file where it's supposed to go has to 
> be related with the function itself, e.g. here i386/i386/setjmp.h 
> seems like a good candidate.

Of course, it was obvious. They all (kern/xpr.c, ddb/db_command.c, ddb/
db_cond.c) contain conditional includes for <machine/setjmp.h>. Putting 
'extern int _setjmp(jmp_buf_t*)' to i386/i386/setjmp.h removes three 
implicit declaration warnings.

Thanks for explaining this.