[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:17:05 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Roland McGrath, le Mon 15 Jul 2013 09:44:52 -0700, a écrit :
> They are separate because they do different things. This doesn't seem like
> it should need a lot of justification to Hurd hackers. If you want to roll
> things together just because you always run them both,
That's not what he said. He said there is a lot of information
propagated from init to proc, and thus the separation is questionable.
Samuel
- Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc, Samuel Thibault, 2013/07/15
- Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc, Roland McGrath, 2013/07/15
- Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc,
Samuel Thibault <=
- kill (0, SIGSTOP) is freezing the system (was: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc), Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
- [PATCH 2/7] hurd: add proc_mark_essential, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
- [PATCH 1/7] proc: add proc_mark_essential server code, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
- [PATCH 4/7] init: Build fixes, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
- [PATCH 3/7] init: Mark auth, proc and fs servers as essential, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
- [PATCH 6/7] proc: evil hack, mark all pids<100 essential, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
- [PATCH 5/7] proc: Fix miscalculation of count, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
- Re: kill (0, SIGSTOP) is freezing the system (was: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc), Samuel Thibault, 2013/07/24