[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Apr 2014 22:44:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Indeed, few of the patches at
<http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/hurd/1:0.5.git20140326-1> look
Debian-specific.
For features that are not “fully baked” yet, like DDE, wouldn’t it make
sense to have a branch in the Hurd repo, instead of a set of patches in
Debian?
As for patches for which review “never completed”, there should really
be a timeout IMO, and the patch should be either rejected for everyone
(including Debian), or accepted, or amended.
My 2¢,
Ludo’.
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], (continued)
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Justus Winter, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff,
Ludovic Courtès <=