Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff]

[Zhang Cong]

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:

Again, no.  Drivers can work the way they prefer.  The driver
infrastructure itself doesn't need a "bigplan", it is parts of it which
need their own.  For instance, the IRQ issue I mentioned has its plan
by itself, and it doesn't need to interfere with the physical memory
allocation issue.

 

That's not sure,  unless we have a plenty of driver works, we may need adjust the infrastructure for the need or some new abstract .

Although we have driver infrastructure, no enough third part driver provider now. 

The audio driver and video driver may be part of hurd at first ( just on repo's view), at least some high level abstract, this need a plan.

Cong Zhang