[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 Apr 2014 23:22:57 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 12 Apr 2014 01:04:49 +0200, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 11 Apr 2014 23:51:44 +0200, a écrit :
> > So, do we really want to let munmap poke a hole at address 0 and thus
> > let further vm_map() return address 0?
>
> i.e. we could apply this:
I have applied it.
Samuel
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/04
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/04/09
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/16
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/18
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/04/24
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Justus Winter, 2014/04/26
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/04/26
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Justus Winter, 2014/04/26