[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd
From: |
Justus Winter |
Subject: |
Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:59:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
alot/0.3.5 |
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-12-08 13:11:22)
> fprintf(stderr)+fflush *does* work, I've been using various times.
I like to use error (0, 0, "didum"). It's easy to use, prints the
servers name, prints a newline and does fflush. The most annoying
thing about it is that it doesn't print the message atomically.
Justus
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, (continued)
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Svante Signell, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Samuel Thibault, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Svante Signell, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Samuel Thibault, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Samuel Thibault, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Svante Signell, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Samuel Thibault, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Svante Signell, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Samuel Thibault, 2014/12/08
- Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd,
Justus Winter <=
Re: Confusing results when trying to debug fakeroot-hurd, Samuel Thibault, 2014/12/08