[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2015 10:04:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 13 May 2015 09:57:27 +0200, a écrit :
> > + return file_set_translator (netfs_node_netnode (np)->file,
> > + FS_TRANS_EXCL|FS_TRANS_SET,
> > + FS_TRANS_EXCL|FS_TRANS_SET, 0,
> > + argz, argzlen,
> > + MACH_PORT_NULL, MACH_MSG_TYPE_COPY_SEND);
>
> Mmm, I don't think you want to set the active_flags parameter, see the
> comment above:
And you have set the active parameter to MACH_PORT_NULL, so active_flags
should really be set to 0, it doesn't really make sense otherwise.
Samuel
- Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Svante Signell, 2015/05/04
- Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Samuel Thibault, 2015/05/06
- Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Svante Signell, 2015/05/07
- Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Samuel Thibault, 2015/05/07
- RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Svante Signell, 2015/05/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Samuel Thibault, 2015/05/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Svante Signell, 2015/05/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Samuel Thibault, 2015/05/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Svante Signell, 2015/05/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Samuel Thibault, 2015/05/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] Re: Test case for fakeroot-hurd failure with a socket, Samuel Thibault, 2015/05/13