Re: new hurd & gnumach packages

[Richard Braun]

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:33:50AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I got another hit, I have attached the screenshot, and here are the
> addrlines:

This is scary. Justus and I never saw anything wrong in a month
with regular builds of iceweasel/hurd/glibc packages, and you get
two assertions in a few days...

> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/debug.c:97
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/debug.c:66
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/rdxtree.c:233
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../kern/rdxtree.h:94
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/ipc_object.c:660
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/ipc_kmsg.c:2300
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/ipc_kmsg.c:2408
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/ipc_kmsg.c:2512
> /usr/src/gnumach/build-dbg/../ipc/mach_msg.c:1466

It looks like there is discrepancy between ipc/ipc_object.c:660 and
kern/rdxtree.h:94. Can you manage to get -O0 traces ?

-- 
Richard Braun