[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support
|
From: |
Richard Braun |
|
Subject: |
Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:23:49 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:16:17PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 12:20:18 +0100, wrote:
> > Why, because it doesn't have a sleep statement?
>
> I was referring to strict logic: it's not just because it happens to
Also, using sleep for synchronization is always wrong.
--
Richard Braun
- Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/13
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/13
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support,
Richard Braun <=
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Richard Braun, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14