[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3
From: |
Richard Braun |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3 |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:27:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:29:17PM -0300, Agustina Arzille wrote:
> Those are some of the many differences I can think of right now. I don't mean
> to disparage Neal's work; I simply think that since we have a better tool for
> synchronization, it's time to revamp libpthread :)
I agree, we shouldn't cling on our current implementation, and I'm
sure we can deal with the bugs in short time with our experience and
Agustina's help.
--
Richard Braun
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/18
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Agustina Arzille, 2016/04/19
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/24
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Agustina Arzille, 2016/04/25
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/25
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/25
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Richard Braun, 2016/04/26
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Agustina Arzille, 2016/04/28
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/29
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/20