[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3
|
From: |
Richard Braun |
|
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:59:06 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:37:31AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> We can turn translators into using mutexes and then fix
> pthread_spin_lock into really spinning, but independently.
I agree with that, and I think it was our intention when we switched
from using cthreads, but we didn't, exactly because of the performance
overhead of our current mutexes.
--
Richard Braun
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/18
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Agustina Arzille, 2016/04/19
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/24
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Agustina Arzille, 2016/04/25
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/25
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/25
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3,
Richard Braun <=
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Agustina Arzille, 2016/04/28
- Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/29
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach v3, Samuel Thibault, 2016/04/20